Social Network for Web Professionals

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive
 

https://www.webmaisterpro.com/images/infographics/google_algorithm_changes_1998_2012.pngThis is the list of major Google algorithm update in the last 8 years, recently published by SEO.com and verified by me in some of my notes and Google Webmaster Central Blog.

  •  Boston (March 2003) – The Boston update focused on incoming links and unique content. The result was that many webmasters reported a drop in backlinks and a corresponding drop in PageRank.
  • Cassandra (April 2003) – This update focused on domain name relevance. The idea was that companies should choose a name that reflects their domain name.
  • Dominic  (May 2003) – This update was named after the pizza restaurant in Boston that was visited often by PubCon attendees. The update focused on making the search process theme based, and linking a data center to a particular search. The update made it clear that each data center was meant to do different things.
  • Esmerelda  (June 2003) – The third in a series of updates that gave preference to pages that gave more specific information to a visitor. The update revealed that internal pages within a website may have better relevance for the Dominic update, which seemed to give the homepage preference to even searches that were aimed at a specific query. Users reported that spam was considerably less than after the Dominic and Cassandra updates. The third in a series of updates that gave preference to pages that gave more specific information to a visitor. The update revealed that internal pages within a website may have better relevance for the Dominic update, which seemed to give the homepage preference to even searches that were aimed at a specific query. Users reported that spam was considerably less than after the Dominic and Cassandra updates.
  • Florida (November 2003) – The update reflected Google’s shift from simple filters to an attempt to understand contextually the scope of the search and potential search results. The update cleaned up spam with simple linking and other features that gave more weight to well optimized and cleanly linked sites. Webmasters welcomed the update and it showed that Google was giving top priority to the searchers’ interests. The update was an attempt to encourage white hat websites, which adhered to the quality requirements.
  • Austin  (January 2004) – The update focused on a practice called Google Bombing, where people manipulated the system to produce misleading results. The focus shifted to sites with minimal keyword density and good internal linking. Relevant links were given more weight in that sites that linked to other sites in a similar industry did better in the search results.
  • Brandy  (February 2004) – Google placed more emphasis on words like trust, authority and reputation. Update showed that providing relevant information is the key. There was greater importance placed on the quality of content on a website. Google also stressed the importance of Latent Semantic Indexing.
  • Bourbon (May 2005) – Google launched this update in response to spam complaints and re-inclusion requests. Strategic changes in the process were implemented to make it more effective. The update also focused on moving from old data centers to new ones.
  • Allegra (February 2005) – This was an attempt by Google to identify spam sites that still managed to rank high in the search results. Google asked users to give feedback about sites that actually deserved higher rankings but did not receive them. Users complained that their sites disappeared from the search results and that some spam sites still ranked well.
  • Jagger (October / November 2005) – Google encouraged users to give feedback concerning websites that used black hat SEO strategies to rank well. Sites which were found to be using such techniques were removed from the search results. Google cleaned up canonical problems and focused on relevance in reciprocal linking.
  • Big Daddy (February 2006) – Google focused on inbound and outbound links. Sites that have very low trust in links, or linked out to many spam sites saw pages disappear from the index. Spam sites were moved into a supplemental category in the search results. Users noticed that even after complying with Google’s help that their websites were still going supplemental.
  • Pluto (August 2006) – Update focused on backlinks reported by Google. There were no significant changes in search engine results.
  • Caffeine (August 2009) – Update focused on infrastructure to allow Google to better index information online, and do it much faster. It enabled deeper processing, which allowed Google to deliver more relevant search results. This update eventually allowed Google to introduce page speed as a ranking factor. Caffeine was delayed many times before get life and was not applied worldwide immediately.
  • Mayday  (May 2010) – Google launched update that focused on long tail traffic. Generally at this point, cross linking pages have become one of the most important factors for high SERP even with low link popularity.
  • Panda (February 2011) – Google cracked down on content farms and sites that had low quality, thin or scraped content. Focus was placed on unique content and content depth. Many websites were affected by the update. Most content farms got hit hard. The Panda update has been rolled out in several steps throughout the year.
  • Penguin (May 2012) - Another major update, this time targeting major part of algorithm related to link building and link evaluation. Penguin 1.1 was announced on 25h of May 2012 and again 39 new changes were introduced few days later. Natural link building is more important than ever, as well many websites got penalized for selling or buying links.

For sure I have to mention that during this years, some of the updates have been overwritten and few things dropped out of account. There were rumors that Mayday update was discard soon after Google apply it. Of course Google is performing small tweaks on daily basis, so the best is to follow official sources.

Take a look at infographic related to Google updates at our Webmaster Blog.